A glance at Puff Bar and Its Try to Displace the Disposable E-Cigarette


A glance at Puff Bar and Its Try to Displace the Disposable E-Cigarette

Much remains unknown concerning the all-popular disposable electronic cigarette referred to as the Puff Bar. Because the devices have become popular with younger people recently, much as flavored e-cigs have been popular among adults, so too has Puff Bar. It is difficult to classify these devices as a scam due to the fact that nobody really knows who designs and produces the Puff Bar and where it originated from. However, a lot of the features associated with the Puff Bar make it seem more than yet another cheap electronic cigarette. Lets look deeper in to the mystery of this seemingly new product.

Puff Bar

One of the biggest mysteries about Puff Bar is apparently its manufacturing and distribution. The company doesn’t even list a home address on their website. Most of the other major manufacturers of the type of puff disposable devices, such as the Hitachi and Kronic, have addresses listed on the websites. Puff Bar’s manufacturer, though, doesn’t offer any. Their only contact information is a telephone number that is not recognized.

This lack of contact information makes it appear as if the company doesn’t really care to make certain that their product is sold in the United States. There are numerous of different theories surrounding the company behind Puff Bar and their products. Some say that Puff Bar can be an attempt by Kronic to take a leadership position in the electronic cigarette market by launching a product that appears to be strongly similar to the Kronic product. Kronic developed its own flavored disposable e-liquid cigarettes that use tobacco products, but did not go public until very recently.

Others believe that Puff Bar is merely an attempt to capture the same profits because the tobacco industry. They argue that there surely is not enough money available in the marketplace for just two companies to compete successfully with each other when there are at the very least three other companies that make high quality nicotine-free cartridges that are more expensive than the typical disposable style. The result is that consumers will have to choose between the expensive nicotine products and the less costly puff bars. Many consumers, especially adults, are willing to accept the higher cost of the refill kit over needing to make a purchase of yet another cartridge. In essence, they’re trading in one product for another that they can both enjoy for the same price.

A more likely theory surrounding Puff Bar is that it’s section of a marketing effort to improve awareness of Kronic’s own type of nicotine based cartridges. A lot of the claims that have been made about Puff Bar are similar to those made about Kronic’s own Nic Fontenelle product line. The largest difference is that Kronic offers a Pod device in addition to the JUUL Pods puff bars. Although it is unclear what the goal of the Pod device is, the truth that it does resemble a pod device utilized by smokers to transport their liquid nicotine has led many to trust that Puff Bar is intended to be used in conjunction with the Pod. The problem with this particular interpretation is that there is no way to know whether or not the company intended for Puff Bar to function in this manner. With the rise of the pre-filled device, it seems likely that this interpretation could be proven wrong.

The next most common explanation for why Puff Bar is being positioned as a replacement for the disposable pod device is due to its claim to offer several allergenic flavors. Since Puff Bar will come in a variety of flavors, chances are that this aspect was thought to be a desirable feature by the business prior to its appearance available to buy. The truth is that Puff Bar is difficult to find in stores without causing a operate on the product. This is because unlike a disposable pod device, where customers can choose from various standard flavor offerings, Puff Bar is offered in a single flavor (Tobacco) along with several different inhalation methodologies. This limits the power of consumers to purchase based on their personal preferences. Furthermore, Puff Bar is only appropriate for an electronic cigarette, which means that smokers must use the pre-filled device to take it out of their mouths.

The final explanation why Puff Bar is being positioned as a potential replacement to the disposable device is due to its claim to offer around 300 puffs flavors. Guava is one of the most popular and most well known flavors in Puff Bar’s lineup. Although it is clear that guava is popular among consumers, it ought to be noted that the company does not expect guava to be a long-term replacement for cigarettes. As smoking rates continue to decline, the popularity of Puff Bar will likely grow. It is unknown if guava will find a place in the product lineup over time, as it is not currently contained in Puff Bar, but it can be done that it could make a debut down the road. For now, it appears that guava isn’t a flavor which will be viewed as desirable by consumers searching for an alternative to cigarette smoking.

To conclude, it is unclear whether Puff Bar is right for each consumer looking for an alternative solution to cigarette smoking. Having less nicotine makes it difficult for people to become addicted to smoking, while the selection of flavors makes it easy to find a favorite. However, for those who are interested in finding a convenient and flavorful alternative to smoking cigarettes, Puff Bar products may be right for you. While not an ideal product, Puff Bar possesses some exciting flavors which have yet to be provided by other companies in the e cigarette products market.